CHRISTIANS WHO ARE TOO SCARED TO BELIEVE IN A RIGGED ELECTION

Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube truly believe you are stupid. Their fact checkers need to be fact checked. They take down posts without warning. They love to say they are neutral, but they are so biased that they are not fooling anyone but themselves.

When someone writes a blog like the one you are reading now, all three of these Big Tech sites love to add a disclaimer under each and every post that even mentions that voter fraud is a possibility. You will see one under this post. Here is what one disclaimer says: “Robust safeguards help ensure the integrity of elections and results.” Here is another example:

Hilarious!

Many American Christians think that voter fraud is a myth, and that this election was not rigged. They are complying with the notion that Biden won the election. What is disturbing is the reason they have rejected the compelling evidence of fraud. They reject it because the idea of such evil is too alarming. They simply don’t want it to be real, therefore, it must not be. Furthermore, they are terrified of being outcasts in this culture—something that may soon be unavoidable because of Christ, not Trump.

Now, let’s look at why I believe there is no way Biden won.

My thanks to J.B. Shurk, who sarcastically calls Biden’s victory a ‘miracle’ and shows us why there has never been an election that is further from “robust safeguards,” “trustworthiness” and “integrity.” Consider the following information:

1. 80 Million Votes for a Washington politician who has been in office for half a century. No incumbent President in nearly a century and a half has gained votes in a re-election campaign and still lost. President Trump gained more than ten million votes since his 2016 victory, but Biden overcame President Trump’s record support among minority voters and shattered Barack Obama’s own popular vote totals by 15 million votes.

Biden gathered a record number of votes even after consistently trailing President Trump in measures of voter enthusiasm. Biden motivated voters who had been unenthusiastic about his campaign, to vote for him―in record numbers.

2. Winning Despite Losing Most Bellwether Counties

Biden would be the first President in 60 years to lose the States of Ohio and Florida on his way to election. For a century, these States have consistently predicted the national outcome; despite national polling giving Biden a lead in both States―he lost Ohio by eight points and Florida by more than three.

Biden lost these key States by notable margins, yet allegedly still won the national election.

Biden appears to be on his way to winning the White House after having lost almost every historic bellwether county across the country. The Wall Street Journal and The Epoch Times independently analyzed the results of 19 counties around the United States that have nearly perfect presidential voting records over the last 40 years. President Trump won every single bellwether county, except Clallam County in Washington State.

Whereas the former VP picked up Clallam by about three points, President Trump’s margin of victory in the other 18 counties averaged over 16 points. In a larger list of 58 bellwether counties that have correctly picked the President since 2000, Trump won 51 of them by an average of 15 points, while the other seven went to Biden by around four points. Bellwether counties overwhelmingly chose President Trump, yet Biden still found a path to victory.

3. Biden Trailed Clinton Except in a Select Few Cities

Pollsters noted a statistical oddity from 2020’s election returns: “Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.” Noting that in those “big cities in swing States run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.”

In the States that mattered most, so many mail-in ballots poured in for Biden from the largest cities that he put up record-breaking numbers and overturned State totals that looked like comfortable leads for President Trump.

4. Biden Won Despite Democrat Losses Everywhere Else

If Biden were to win, it would be in spite of the fact that Donald Trump was the only incumbent President in U.S. history to lose his re-election while his own party gained seats in the House of Representatives.

In 2020, The Cook Political Report and The New York Times rated 27 House seats as toss-ups going into Election Day. Right now, Republicans appear to have won all 27. Democrats failed to flip a single state house chamber, while Republicans flipped both the House and Senate in New Hampshire and expanded their dominance of State legislatures across the country. Somehow, Biden beat the man who lifted all other Republicans to victory.

5. Biden Overcame Trump’s Commanding Primary Vote

Primary vote totals are usually very accurate in predicting general election winners.

First, no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election.

Second, President Trump received 94 percent of the primary vote, which is the fourth highest of all time (higher than Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon, Clinton, or Obama). In fact, Trump is only one of five incumbents since 1912 to receive more than 90 percent of the primary vote.

Third, Trump set a record for most primary votes received by an incumbent when more than 18 million people turned out for him in 2020 (the previous record, held by Bill Clinton, was half that number).

Joe Biden reportedly has prevailed in the general election, despite Trump’s historic support in the primaries. This means Biden has achieved the impossible.

“Why are no journalists reporting these amazing feats?” ―J.B. Shurk

American Christians need to separate themselves from their distaste for Trump and look at reality. American freedom, and therefore religious freedom, will go away permanently if the Biden-Harris ticket succeeds in stealing this election by fraud.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/23/5-more-ways-joe-biden-magically-outperformed-election-norms/?fbclid=IwAR1u45VgSGQKPsKVQGKqZeWl6QhbTqZaHtig25tq0BoJSy1Rd_RrMkBem40

 

 

 

 

P.S. We do not want to blunt the message you just read. This part is for anyone who wants to help  Mario Murillo’s ministry to America. We are in the process of invading Bakersfield California. The tent crusade starts on Monday night January 11th at 6:30 PM. 

We have a win-win offer. You can help support miracle soul winning in Bakersfield and get the following offer:

MARIO MURILLO’S TWO MOST POWERFUL BOOKS TOGETHER. PERFECT READING FOR STRENGTH, POWER, AND DIRECTION IN THESE EXPLOSIVE TIMES. NOT ONLY THAT BUT YOU WILL HELP WIN SOULS IN CALIFORNIA. JANUARY 11-13 WE RETURN TO THE HIGHWAY 99 CORRIDOR OF GLORY: BAKERSFIELD!

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is the-dynamic-duo.jpg

That is why we must make this stunning book offer to you. Now in its fourth printing, Vessels of Fire and Glory keeps reaching the top of its category on Amazon.  Critical Mass has now sold over 150,000 copies and remains an international classic on awakening. Both books are still in high demand. So why are we making this amazing offer to you? California is the reason why.

We need to act fast in California for two big reasons. First, Fresno was a shocking breakthrough. Fresno is a sign that tens of thousands of Californians hunger for the Gospel. Second, the battle for America will be won or lost in California.

You get both books for just $20. Not only that—Mario will autograph your copy of Vessels of Fire and Glory. On top of that…you get free shipping.

This is a double win for you. You get these choice books at an excellent price and the proceeds go to win lost souls in California.

And there is still more. If you order 10 or more sets of the Dynamic Duo, your cost is $18 a set.  Plus you will get free 2-3 day priority shipping. Click on link below to order now!  

https://mariomurillo.org/product/dynamic-duo/

THOSE CHRISTIANS WHO CANNOT BELIEVE IN A RIGGED ELECTION

Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube truly believe you are stupid. Their fact checkers need to be fact checked. They take down posts without warning. They love to say they are neutral, but they are so biased that they are not fooling anyone but themselves.

When someone writes a blog like the one you are reading now, all three of these Big Tech sites love to add a disclaimer under each and every post that even mentions that voter fraud is a possibility. You will see one under this post. Here is what one disclaimer says: “Robust safeguards help ensure the integrity of elections and results.” Here is another example:

Hilarious!

Many American Christians think that voter fraud is a myth, and that this election was not rigged. They are complying with the notion that Biden won the election. What is disturbing is the reason they have rejected the compelling evidence of fraud. They reject it because the idea of such evil is too alarming. They simply don’t want it to be real, therefore, it must not be. Furthermore, they are terrified of being outcasts in this culture—something that may soon be unavoidable because of Christ, not Trump.

Now, let’s look at why I believe there is no way Biden won.

My thanks to J.B. Shurk, who sarcastically calls Biden’s victory a ‘miracle’ and shows us why there has never been an election that is further from “robust safeguards,” “trustworthiness” and “integrity.” Consider the following information:

1. 80 Million Votes for a Washington politician who has been in office for half a century. No incumbent President in nearly a century and a half has gained votes in a re-election campaign and still lost. President Trump gained more than ten million votes since his 2016 victory, but Biden overcame President Trump’s record support among minority voters and shattered Barack Obama’s own popular vote totals by 15 million votes.

Biden gathered a record number of votes even after consistently trailing President Trump in measures of voter enthusiasm. Biden motivated voters who had been unenthusiastic about his campaign, to vote for him―in record numbers.

2. Winning Despite Losing Most Bellwether Counties

Biden would be the first President in 60 years to lose the States of Ohio and Florida on his way to election. For a century, these States have consistently predicted the national outcome; despite national polling giving Biden a lead in both States―he lost Ohio by eight points and Florida by more than three.

Biden lost these key States by notable margins, yet allegedly still won the national election.

Biden appears to be on his way to winning the White House after having lost almost every historic bellwether county across the country. The Wall Street Journal and The Epoch Times independently analyzed the results of 19 counties around the United States that have nearly perfect presidential voting records over the last 40 years. President Trump won every single bellwether county, except Clallam County in Washington State.

Whereas the former VP picked up Clallam by about three points, President Trump’s margin of victory in the other 18 counties averaged over 16 points. In a larger list of 58 bellwether counties that have correctly picked the President since 2000, Trump won 51 of them by an average of 15 points, while the other seven went to Biden by around four points. Bellwether counties overwhelmingly chose President Trump, yet Biden still found a path to victory.

3. Biden Trailed Clinton Except in a Select Few Cities

Pollsters noted a statistical oddity from 2020’s election returns: “Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.” Noting that in those “big cities in swing States run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.”

In the States that mattered most, so many mail-in ballots poured in for Biden from the largest cities that he put up record-breaking numbers and overturned State totals that looked like comfortable leads for President Trump.

4. Biden Won Despite Democrat Losses Everywhere Else

If Biden were to win, it would be in spite of the fact that Donald Trump was the only incumbent President in U.S. history to lose his re-election while his own party gained seats in the House of Representatives.

In 2020, The Cook Political Report and The New York Times rated 27 House seats as toss-ups going into Election Day. Right now, Republicans appear to have won all 27. Democrats failed to flip a single state house chamber, while Republicans flipped both the House and Senate in New Hampshire and expanded their dominance of State legislatures across the country. Somehow, Biden beat the man who lifted all other Republicans to victory.

5. Biden Overcame Trump’s Commanding Primary Vote

Primary vote totals are usually very accurate in predicting general election winners.

First, no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election.

Second, President Trump received 94 percent of the primary vote, which is the fourth highest of all time (higher than Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon, Clinton, or Obama). In fact, Trump is only one of five incumbents since 1912 to receive more than 90 percent of the primary vote.

Third, Trump set a record for most primary votes received by an incumbent when more than 18 million people turned out for him in 2020 (the previous record, held by Bill Clinton, was half that number).

Joe Biden reportedly has prevailed in the general election, despite Trump’s historic support in the primaries. This means Biden has achieved the impossible.

“Why are no journalists reporting these amazing feats?” ―J.B. Shurk

American Christians need to separate themselves from their distaste for Trump and look at reality. American freedom, and therefore religious freedom, will go away permanently if the Biden-Harris ticket succeeds in stealing this election by fraud.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/23/5-more-ways-joe-biden-magically-outperformed-election-norms/?fbclid=IwAR1u45VgSGQKPsKVQGKqZeWl6QhbTqZaHtig25tq0BoJSy1Rd_RrMkBem40

 

 

This is a message to those who support Mario Murillo’s message to America.

BREAKING NEWS! MARIO MURILLO’S TWO MOST POWERFUL BOOKS TOGETHER. PERFECT READING FOR STRENGTH, POWER, AND DIRECTION IN THESE EXPLOSIVE TIMES. NOT ONLY THAT BUT YOU WILL HELP WIN SOULS IN CALIFORNIA. JANUARY 11-13 WE RETURN TO THE HIGHWAY 99 CORRIDOR OF GLORY: BAKERSFIELD!

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is the-dynamic-duo.jpg

That is why we must make this stunning book offer to you. Now in its fourth printing, Vessels of Fire and Glory keeps reaching the top of its category on Amazon.  Critical Mass has now sold over 150,000 copies and remains an international classic on awakening. Both books are still in high demand. So why are we making this amazing offer to you? California is the reason why.

We need to act fast in California for two big reasons. First, Fresno was a shocking breakthrough. Fresno is a sign that tens of thousands of Californians hunger for the Gospel. Second, the battle for America will be won or lost in California.

You get both books for just $20. Not only that—Mario will autograph your copy of Vessels of Fire and Glory. On top of that…you get free shipping.

This is a double win for you. You get these choice books at an excellent price and the proceeds go to win lost souls in California.

And there is still more. If you order 10 or more sets of the Dynamic Duo, your cost is $18 a set. Click on link below to order now!

https://mariomurillo.org/product/dynamic-duo/    

AMERICAN CHRISTIANS WHO CANNOT BELIEVE IN A RIGGED ELECTION

Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube truly believe you are stupid. They love to say they are neutral, but they are so biased that they are not fooling anyone but themselves.

When someone writes a blog like the one you are reading now, all three of these Big Tech sites love to add a disclaimer under each and every post that even mentions that voter fraud is a possibility. You will see one under this post. Here is what one disclaimer says: “Robust safeguards help ensure the integrity of elections and results.” Here is another example:

Hilarious!

Many American Christians think that voter fraud is a myth, and that this election was not rigged. They are complying with the notion that Biden won the election. What is disturbing is the reason they have rejected the compelling evidence of fraud. They reject it because the idea of such evil is too alarming. They simply don’t want it to be real, therefore, it must not be. Furthermore, they are terrified of being outcasts in this culture—something that may soon be unavoidable because of Christ, not Trump.

Now, let’s look at why I believe there is no way Biden won.

My thanks to J.B. Shurk, who sarcastically calls Biden’s victory a ‘miracle’ and shows us why there has never been an election that is further from “robust safeguards,” “trustworthiness” and “integrity.” Consider the following information:

1. 80 Million Votes for a Washington politician who has been in office for half a century. No incumbent President in nearly a century and a half has gained votes in a re-election campaign and still lost. President Trump gained more than ten million votes since his 2016 victory, but Biden overcame President Trump’s record support among minority voters and shattered Barack Obama’s own popular vote totals by 15 million votes.

Biden gathered a record number of votes even after consistently trailing President Trump in measures of voter enthusiasm. Biden motivated voters who had been unenthusiastic about his campaign, to vote for him―in record numbers.

2. Winning Despite Losing Most Bellwether Counties

Biden would be the first President in 60 years to lose the States of Ohio and Florida on his way to election. For a century, these States have consistently predicted the national outcome; despite national polling giving Biden a lead in both States―he lost Ohio by eight points and Florida by more than three.

Biden lost these key States by notable margins, yet allegedly still won the national election.

Biden appears to be on his way to winning the White House after having lost almost every historic bellwether county across the country. The Wall Street Journal and The Epoch Times independently analyzed the results of 19 counties around the United States that have nearly perfect presidential voting records over the last 40 years. President Trump won every single bellwether county, except Clallam County in Washington State.

Whereas the former VP picked up Clallam by about three points, President Trump’s margin of victory in the other 18 counties averaged over 16 points. In a larger list of 58 bellwether counties that have correctly picked the President since 2000, Trump won 51 of them by an average of 15 points, while the other seven went to Biden by around four points. Bellwether counties overwhelmingly chose President Trump, yet Biden still found a path to victory.

3. Biden Trailed Clinton Except in a Select Few Cities

Pollsters noted a statistical oddity from 2020’s election returns: “Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.” Noting that in those “big cities in swing States run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.”

In the States that mattered most, so many mail-in ballots poured in for Biden from the largest cities that he put up record-breaking numbers and overturned State totals that looked like comfortable leads for President Trump.

4. Biden Won Despite Democrat Losses Everywhere Else

If Biden were to win, it would be in spite of the fact that Donald Trump was the only incumbent President in U.S. history to lose his re-election while his own party gained seats in the House of Representatives.

In 2020, The Cook Political Report and The New York Times rated 27 House seats as toss-ups going into Election Day. Right now, Republicans appear to have won all 27. Democrats failed to flip a single state house chamber, while Republicans flipped both the House and Senate in New Hampshire and expanded their dominance of State legislatures across the country. Somehow, Biden beat the man who lifted all other Republicans to victory.

5. Biden Overcame Trump’s Commanding Primary Vote

Primary vote totals are usually very accurate in predicting general election winners.

First, no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election.

Second, President Trump received 94 percent of the primary vote, which is the fourth highest of all time (higher than Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon, Clinton, or Obama). In fact, Trump is only one of five incumbents since 1912 to receive more than 90 percent of the primary vote.

Third, Trump set a record for most primary votes received by an incumbent when more than 18 million people turned out for him in 2020 (the previous record, held by Bill Clinton, was half that number).

Joe Biden reportedly has prevailed in the general election, despite Trump’s historic support in the primaries. This means Biden has achieved the impossible.

“Why are no journalists reporting these amazing feats?” ―J.B. Shurk

American Christians need to separate themselves from their distaste for Trump and look at reality. American freedom, and therefore religious freedom, will go away permanently if the Biden-Harris ticket succeeds in stealing this election by fraud.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/23/5-more-ways-joe-biden-magically-outperformed-election-norms/?fbclid=IwAR1u45VgSGQKPsKVQGKqZeWl6QhbTqZaHtig25tq0BoJSy1Rd_RrMkBem40

This is a message to those who support Mario Murillo’s message to America.

BREAKING NEWS! MARIO MURILLO’S TWO MOST POWERFUL BOOKS TOGETHER. PERFECT READING FOR STRENGTH, POWER, AND DIRECTION IN THESE EXPLOSIVE TIMES. NOT ONLY THAT BUT YOU WILL HELP WIN SOULS IN CALIFORNIA. JANUARY 11-13 WE RETURN TO THE HIGHWAY 99 CORRIDOR OF GLORY: BAKERSFIELD!

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is the-dynamic-duo.jpg

That is why we must make this stunning book offer to you. Now in its fourth printing, Vessels of Fire and Glory keeps reaching the top of its category on Amazon.  Critical Mass has now sold over 150,000 copies and remains an international classic on awakening. Both books are still in high demand. So why are we making this amazing offer to you? California is the reason why.

We need to act fast in California for two big reasons. First, Fresno was a shocking breakthrough. Fresno is a sign that tens of thousands of Californians hunger for the Gospel. Second, the battle for America will be won or lost in California.

You get both books for just $20. Not only that—Mario will autograph your copy of Vessels of Fire and Glory. On top of that…you get free shipping.

This is a double win for you. You get these choice books at an excellent price and the proceeds go to win lost souls in California.

And there is still more. If you order 10 or more sets of the Dynamic Duo, your cost is $18 a set. Click on link below to order now!

https://mariomurillo.org/product/dynamic-duo/    

WHEN PEOPLE DESPISE THEIR OWN DELIVERANCE

It’s a real movement and there are even real t-shirts you can buy. They say things like, “Christians Against Trump” or “Loyal To Christ Not Trump.” Presumably, if they are Christians who are against Trump, they are also against the Christians who are for Trump. I am not trying to be technical, it’s just a fact. The reason I begin with that, is so you will know that I am not picking on them—they are picking on us.

They are saying and doing things against believers who support Trump and I find that disgraceful. It is one thing to disagree with Trump, but quite another to impugn the character of Trump supporters.

Since there is nothing uglier than a family fight, I am writing this under extreme duress and with reluctance. However, the situation is too grave to allow this attack to go unanswered.

What is wrong with these people? Let me answer that by introducing you to a personality type that is in sad abundance today: The ‘nattering nabob.’ These are people who suddenly and inexplicably turn against their own convictions just so they will look good to the other side. These three prominent men qualify currently: George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, and John Kasich.

Nattering Nabobs spout a lot of words, but you can’t follow them or make any sense of their diatribes. Today they are adamantly for what they were adamantly against, yesterday. And, as of now, they are vehemently opposed to what they were vehemently in favor of ten minutes ago.  They make nonsensical arguments and feel exhilarated, while everyone else in the room looks on with bewilderment and, in many cases, pity.

The most classic feature of a nattering nabob, is that they have a complaint and a rant, but they provide no alternative for the problem. Incredulously, Bush is going to vote for Biden. Mitt Romney actually voted for the impeachment of Trump, and John Kasich, a Republican in name only, humiliated himself at the Democrat Convention by pandering to the enemies of freedom.

Underneath all their pomp is a hidden motive. Trump, in their view, has done them wrong. Bush saw his brother bashed. That means he can,  with a clear conscience, support the socialist apocalypse and late term abortion he once hated. Mitt Romney, was snubbed by Trump, so he now feels justified in going against his former convictions. John Kasich is by far the saddest. His resentment gave way to a delirium where he is the only one in the room that doesn’t know how pathetic and ludicrous he is.

The same thing applies to these believers who bought the t-shirt. The most interesting thing about them comes when you ask them what they think is the alternative to Biden. They know the horror he represents. They know Biden celebrates everything a believer should find abhorrent. When you confront the “woke believer” for a solution to the problem, look closely and see if they don’t suddenly remind you of the times when Captain Kirk outsmarted an enemy computer that began to smoke and exclaim, “It does not compute!” Or you will hear ethereal platitudes better fit for a lecture on unicorns.

I get it. You find Trump offensive, my brother and sister in the Lord. I also get the cheap and easy acceptance readily available from the Left, and the stigma attached to standing against peer pressure.

But remember, President Trump stands with all evangelical Christians and supports Israel. He deserves your support. Why would you side with the enemies of America and God by voting against him?

I am not saying that Trump is a ‘type’ of Christ, but what I am saying is that Christ was a deliverance that the Jews found offensive. When Jesus saw that they despised their own deliverance He wept.

“Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, saying, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes. For days will come upon you when your enemies will build an embankment around you, surround you and close you in on every side, and level you, and your children within you, to the ground; and they will not leave in you one stone upon another, because you did not know the time of your visitation” Luke 19:41-44).

Can you honestly say you have asked God about Trump?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear reader,
This is a message to those who support Mario Murillo’s message to America.
As you know, the lockdown stopped our tent crusades and we are locked in a battle to restart them in Fresno on October 11th. Our major support came from tent outreaches. Prayerfully, Mario decided he would stop raising outreach money, but still keep his outreach team on full salary.
God gave Mario an idea that is win-win. Take our 3 bestselling books, make them a collection and offer them for just $27.
This collection includes a signed copy of Mario’s latest book Vessels of Fire and GloryCritical Mass the classic on revival—Edgewise a guide to living in the last days. We call it the War Chest Collection.
When you get the War Chest Collection you not only get three amazing books—books that can change your life—you are keeping Mario’s voice strong, and you are keeping us ready to invade.  Order your War Chest Collection now.   

Use this link to order right now  https://mariomurillo.org/product/war-chest-collection/

WHY TRUMP IS RIGHT ABOUT GEORGE W. BUSH

President Trump was right to call out George W. Bush, who was silent about national unity during the criminally depraved impeachment trial. But now, suddenly, Bush is all for unity during the pandemic?

George W. Bush of all people should have been outraged by the assault Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, and Jerry Nadler made on the Presidency.  With all due respect, I believe he should have been a bigger man at that time. Whatever petty baggage he carries from his perception of Trump’s treatment of his brother Jeb, is nothing compared to the horror and permanent damage this false impeachment did to the Executive Branch of the United States government.

Let’s turn to the Bible for insight on why Bush is wrong. In 2 Samuel 1:14, King David was confronted by a man who claimed to have killed King Saul, David’s mortal enemy. “So David said to him, “How was it you were not afraid to put forth your hand to destroy the Lord’s anointed?” Though Saul had tried on numerous occasions to kill David, David still mourned Saul’s death and even executed the man who had not been afraid to take the crown off Saul’s head, and bringing it, with the armlet from Saul’s arm. Why?

Because David believed that no matter what, Saul was God’s anointed. David respected the office. George Bush—of all people—should have respected the office. The time for him to speak out for unity and to warn that something could destroy us was during the fraud impeachment of Trump, not now.

Bush should have protested the disgraceful attack on the office of President by the Democrats. Bush should have warned the nation then about how we are all in this together. He should have protected the Executive branch of government from tyranny.

Mr. Bush knows, as few men know, the corruption of the Democrat Party. He also knows the long term damage these leftists have set in motion for future Presidents. Impeachment has been weaponized. It will be used to destroy any President that the House of Representatives does not approve of. It will be used even when there is no evidence of wrong doing. That was the new ground that Pelosi and her cohorts broke.

Let’s say—God forbid—that Biden wins. The Republican retaliation will be swift and withering.

Let’s say Donald Trump wins. Adam Schiff has already begun new impeachment hearings, and he can do so because the precedent has been set by their previous attempt at impeachment. And because there were no consequences for Schiff, he feels empowered. Has none of this occurred to George W?

Worst of all, no matter who wins, our devastated economy won’t get strong leadership.  A bitterly divided government will be distracted by more and more investigations and trials.

The American public has just seen two other examples of Democrat debauchery. We recently learned that General Michael Flynn was the target of high level FBI agents who were blindly loyal to Barack Obama. Knowing Flynn was innocent, still they set a trap by lying, and tricked the General into incriminating himself falsely.

We also see how Tara Reade is being trashed by the hypocritical #MeToo movement, because electing Joe Biden justifies depriving abused women of justice. Brett Kavanaugh was guilty until proven innocent. But Joe is innocent until they can change the subject.

Bush’s first loyalty should have been to our system of government. He should have been thinking about the Founding Fathers more than his hurt feelings. If a former President can’t reverence the office, who can?

And how can he say we are in this together when he knows that a rogue government led by Barack Obama and others is feverishly working to destroy the very foundation of our freedom?

Again, what Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, and Jerry Nadler did was evil—an evil that will continue to damage America for many years to come. Such a vicious and baseless ad hominem attack on a sitting President, such blatant lèse majesté of that kind, should have roused George W. Bush to speak out.

If he truly cares about saving America, he would not, in my opinion, call for a fake unity built on sweeping evil under the rug, just because he doesn’t like the victim.

George H.W. Bush to vote for Hillary Clinton

George H.W. Bush to vote for Hillary Clinton

A Kennedy outs a Bush who favors a Clinton.
By DARREN SAMUELSOHN 09/19/16 11:20 PM EDT Updated 09/19/16 11:36 PM EDT

Former President George H.W. Bush is bucking his party’s presidential nominee and plans to vote for Hillary Clinton in November, according to a member of another famous political family, the Kennedys.
Bush, 92, had intended to stay silent on the White House race between Clinton and Donald Trump, a sign in and of itself of his distaste for the GOP nominee. But his preference for the wife of his own successor, President Bill Clinton, nonetheless became known to a wider audience thanks to Kathleen Hartington Kennedy Townsend, the former Maryland lieutenant governor and daughter of the late Robert F. Kennedy.

On Monday, Townsend posted a picture on her Facebook page shaking hands next to the former president and this caption: “The President told me he’s voting for Hillary!!”
In a telephone interview, Townsend said she met with the former president in Maine earlier today, where she said he made his preference known that he was voting for a Democrat. “That’s what he said,” she told POLITICO.

Asked about Townsend’s post, George H.W. Bush spokesman Jim McGrath in an email replied, “The vote President Bush will cast as a private citizen in some 50 days will be just that: a private vote cast in some 50 days. He is not commenting on the presidential race in the interim.”

George H.W. Bush and former First Lady Barbara Bush have stayed out of the political debate since campaigning earlier this year for their son Jeb’s unsuccessful bid for president. Neither George H.W. Bush nor his son, former President George W. Bush, attended this summer’s Republican National Convention in Cleveland where Trump accepted the nomination.

jeb

George W. Bush Bashes Obama on Middle East

In a closed-door meeting with Jewish donors on Saturday night, former President George W. Bush delivered his harshest public criticisms to date against his successor on foreign policy, saying that President Barack Obama is being naïve about Iran and the pending nuclear deal and losing the war against the Islamic State.

One attendee at the Republican Jewish Coalition session, held at the Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas with owner Sheldon Adelson in attendance, transcribed large portions of Bush’s remarks. The former president, who rarely ever criticizes Obama in public, at first remarked that the idea of re-entering the political arena was something he didn’t want to do. He then proceeded to explain why Obama, in his view, was placing the U.S. in “retreat” around the world. He also said Obama was misreading Iran’s intentions while relaxing sanctions on Tehran too easily.

According to the attendee’s transcription, Bush noted that Iran has a new president, Hassan Rouhani. “He’s smooth,” Bush said. “And you’ve got to ask yourself, is there a new policy or did they just change the spokesman?”

Bush said that Obama’s plan to lift sanctions on Iran with a promise that they could snap back in place at any time was not plausible. He also said the deal would be bad for American national security in the long term: “You think the Middle East is chaotic now? Imagine what it looks like for our grandchildren. That’s how Americans should view the deal.”

Bush then went into a detailed criticism of Obama’s policies in fighting the Islamic State and dealing with the chaos in Iraq. On Obama’s decision to withdraw all U.S. troops in Iraq at the end of 2011, he quoted Senator Lindsey Graham calling it a “strategic blunder.” Bush signed an agreement with the Iraqi government to withdraw those troops, but the idea had been to negotiate a new status of forces agreement to keep U.S. forces there past 2011. The Obama administration tried and failed to negotiate such an agreement.

Bush said he views the rise of the Islamic State as al-Qaeda’s “second act” and that they may have changed the name but that murdering innocents is still the favored tactic. He defended his own administration’s handling of terrorism, noting that the terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who confessed to killing Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, was captured on his watch: “Just remember the guy who slit Danny Pearl’s throat is in Gitmo, and now they’re doing it on TV.”

Obama promised to degrade and destroy Islamic State’s forces but then didn’t develop a strategy to complete the mission, Bush said. He said that if you have a military goal and you mean it, “you call in your military and say ‘What’s your plan?’ ” He indirectly touted his own decision to surge troops to Iraq in 2007, by saying, “When the plan wasn’t working in Iraq, we changed.”

“In order to be an effective president … when you say something you have to mean it,” he said. “You gotta kill em.”

Bush told several anecdotes about his old friend and rival Russian President Vladimir Putin. Bush recalled that Putin met his dog Barney at the White House and then later, when Bush went to Moscow, Putin showed him his dog and remarked that he was “bigger stronger and faster than Barney.” For Bush, that behavior showed him that Putin didn’t think in “win-win” terms.

Bush also remarked that Putin was rich, divorced his wife and loves power. Putin’s domestic popularity comes from his control of Russian media, according to Bush. “Hell, I’d be popular, too, if I owned NBC news,” he said.

Regarding his brother Jeb’s potential run for the presidency, Bush acknowledged that he was a political liability for Jeb, that the Bush name can be used against him, and that Americans don’t like dynasties. He also said that foreign policy is going to be especially important in the presidential campaign and that the test for Republicans running will be who has got the “courage” to resist isolationist tendencies.

Regarding Hillary Clinton, Bush said it will be crucial how she plays her relationship with the president. She will eventually have to choose between running on the Obama administration’s policies or running against them. If she defends them, she’s admitting failure, he said, but if she doesn’t she’s blaming the president.

For George W. Bush, the remarks in Vegas showed he has little respect for how the current president is running the world. He also revealed that he takes little responsibility for the policies that he put in place that contributed to the current state of affairs.

Franklin Graham: Both Obama And Bush ‘Have Done A Great Disservice,’ Calling Islam Peaceful

franklin_graham copy

Franklin Graham: Both Obama And Bush ‘Have Done A Great Disservice,’ Calling Islam Peaceful

“Mr. President—followers of a peaceful religion do not cut off the heads of innocent people.”

In a commentary for Decision magazine, evangelist Franklin Graham calls out both President Obama and President Bush for defending Islam as a religion of peace.

Graham is reacting specifically to Obama’s speech before the U.N. in September in which the president said, “Islam teaches peace,” and also to George W. Bush, who, days after 9/11, said, “Islam is peace.”

Graham writes:

Both men have done a great disservice to the American public by not understanding Islam and its teaching in the Quran.

The day after Obama addressed the U.N. in September, Graham recalls that he stood across from the White House in Lafayette Square with the hope that the president would hear his message in praying for the release of imprisoned Iranian-American Christian Saeed Abedini:

Mr. President—followers of a peaceful religion do not cut off the heads of innocent people in the barbaric fashion the world has watched recently.

Mr. President—believers in a peaceful religion do not kidnap 300 young schoolgirls as Boko Haram did in northeastern Nigeria in April and reportedly [sell] them to men to be sex slaves.

Mr. President—men who practice a peaceful religion do not detonate bombs on an American street during a marathon race to kill and maim innocent people.

Mr. President—no one who belongs to a peaceful religion would even consider hijacking jet airliners and flying them into buildings occupied by thousands of innocent people beginning their workday, as happened in this country and in this city on 9/11.

Mr. President—no peaceful religion would tolerate, let alone practice, female circumcision, require a woman to have her husband’s permission to leave her home and take up employment, and restrict her ability to receive justice in the case of sex crimes.

Mr. President—a peaceful religion would not condone and allow a father to drown a daughter in a swimming pool in front of the family in the name of family honor because she might have stayed out late in the evening with her boyfriend.

Mr. President—why haven’t the 3.5 million Muslims in North America rejected this gross, barbaric and despicable behavior by their fellow Muslims on American soil?

And that is Graham’s question left unanswered. He adds: “Why haven’t many, if not most, of the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world condemned these violent crimes against innocent humanity as they have occurred? Why would 23 percent of the world’s population stand by and allow their fellow Muslims to define them by violent behavior if this is truly a religion of peace?”

Christians, Graham affirms, “quickly and unanimously rise together to condemn” violent acts in the name of Christianity. “I cannot recall a single instance of violent behavior supposedly done in the name of Christianity that was not immediately repudiated by the Christian community,” he writes.

Graham calls Islam a “false religion…guided and characterized by treacherous deceit.” Furthermore, he concludes that a false religion can never be a true religion of peace. Only true religion that reconciles “a holy God and sinful man” can “bring lasting peace.”

He is not implying every false religion engages in “barbaric behavior,” but none of them, he says, “can deliver from the damning power of sin:”

Christ alone, the Son of God, saves from sin, Satan and death. He died on the cross for our sins, was buried and rose again from the dead.

My earnest prayer is that the Lord will use the chaotic and frightening events we see happening on the world stage to drive people, including followers of Islam, to the only solution—personal, transforming faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace.

KERRY COMPARES SYRIAN INTERVENTION TO NORMANDY INVASION

KERRY COMPARES SYRIAN INTERVENTION TO NORMANDY INVASION

 44
 0
by TONY LEE 4 Sep 2013 142POST A COMMENT

On Wednesday, Secretary of State John Kerry compared possible military intervention in Syria to the invasion of Normandy during World War II.

Testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Kerry said that “there are a lot of folks out there who are committed to violent acts against lots of different people. We have to defend ourselves.”

After emphasizing that intervening in Syria is a “direct interest in our credibility,” Kerry said, “You ask the question, ‘Why does the United States have to be out there?'”

“You ever been to the cemetery in France? Ya know, above those beaches? Why’d those guys have to go do that?” Kerry said.

In response to Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL), Kerry said those who died in Normandy did so while “standing up with people for a set of values and fighting for freedom.” He said “no country has liberated as much land or fought as many battles as the United States of America and turned around and given it back to the people who live there and can own it, run it.”

Kerry said America was, in that sense, the “indispensable” nation and that a lot of moderate people in the Middle East “count on us.”

Throughout the testimony, though, Kerry emphasized that he did not believe intervention in Syria would be considered “war” in his definition and continued to emphasize that he did not believe American ground troops would be needed in Syria.

Obama’s Crisis of Competence

Obama’s Crisis of Competence

The White House seems more comfortable stage-managing the news than dealing with the uncomfortable crises that inevitably crop up.

By 

Updated: July 3, 2013 | 8:28 a.m.
July 3, 2013 | 7:01 a.m.

President Obama and former President George W. Bush pause for a moment of silence during a wreath-laying ceremony to honor the victims of the U.S. Embassy bombing in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

President Obama returned last night from a weeklong trip to Africa, seeking to position himself as part of ailing Nelson Mandela’s legacy and generating strategic photo-ops. On the other side of the continent, Egypt is awash in revolution, with hundreds of thousands of protesters in Tahrir Square railing against the American-backed president, with some chanting slogans against the American passivity in the face of crisisThe Washington Post editorialized Tuesday: “For months, as the Morsi government has taken steps to consolidate power, quash critics and marginalize independent civil society groups, President Obama and his top aides have been largely silent in public. No effort was made to use the leverage of U.S. aid to compel a change of policy.”

While the president was in Africa, Secretary of State John Kerry spent time in Israel, using valuable political capital trying to jump-start peace talks between the Israelis and the Palestinians, at a time when few serious foreign policy analysts believe it has any chance of succes—beyond garnering favorable press for trying. (The Atlantic‘s Jeffrey Goldberg calls Kerry’s a “delusion of the foreignpolicy elite” in his column today.) This, while the administration appears utterly feckless in neighboring Syria, where civil war worsens, chemical weapons-wielding dictator Bashar al-Assad strengthens his hold on power, and American influence dwindles. “The military situation in Syria is slipping away as the president ponders,” Washington Post columnist Jackson Diehl wrote last week.

And on the domestic front, Obama was comfortably traveling on Air Force One when a Treasury Department functionary announced late Tuesday it would be delaying the mandate that businesses provide health care for their employee—a crucial component in the health care law that is shaping up as the president’s main legacy. Rather than give a speech explaining the delay, and informing the public about how this could affect their health care options, the administration dropped the bombshell news right before the July Fourth holiday weekend.

The administration is facing a crisis of competence. At a time when trust in government is already at an all-time low, the events of this past week illustrate the limits of this president’s power. The White House seems more comfortable stage-managing the news than dealing with the uncomfortable crises that inevitably crop up. (If there’s anything to learn from the Benghazi crisis, it was the administration’s attentiveness to detail in how to avoid blame in the aftermath of the crisis but a lack of focus in how to react as the crisis was occurring.)

The other worrying sign, is that politics is getting in the way of smart policymaking. Wary of the last war in the Middle East, Americans don’t want the United States to intervene in Syria. The White House, heeding the polls, gladly obliged, even figuring out ways to forestall proof that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against its people—the red line that the president famously set. Obama doesn’t want to say anything to take sides between the Egyptian president he backed and the growing throngs of protesters, and then take ownership in a crisis that’s showing no signs of abating. Politically speaking, it’s a lose-lose situation.

On health care, with the 2014 midterms approaching and control of the Senate in play, the administration decided to buy time by delaying the employer mandate until after the elections. Former HHS spokesman Nick Papas said the delay was “about minimizing paperwork, not politics.” But it’s awfully politically convenient to delay implementation of a law that’s been growing more unpopular and whose implementation is shaping up to be a “train wreck,” in the words of Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, a Democrat.

Obama’s second-term legacy is shaping up to be more about avoiding crises than accomplishing big things. Salvage the core of a health care law, avoid worst-case scenarios in Egypt and Syria, and don’t get in the way of his party’s efforts to win Republican support for a landmark immigration reform plan. It’s a far cry from the idealism of his second inaugural. But at this point, the president needs to simply show that he’s paying attention to the fires burning around him.