THE WINNING ARGUMENT

Just for the moment.  Forget about Trump.  Forget about the Wall.  Forget about the “Caravan.”  The case to make against the Democratic Party to the American public is simple.  It begins with simple questions.

Who has fights to stop prayer in schools?  Who has attacked Christmas?  Who tried to ban Bibles?  Who booed God at their convention?  Who sued to put Christian bakers out of business?  Who sued to force Nuns to violate their beliefs?  Who wants certain Christian doctrine banned as hate speech?  Who is constantly trying to get rid of Crosses and Manger scenes?  Who said the church must evolve?  Who said that religious beliefs must be changed?  Who worked to ban Christian clubs on campus?

The winning argument is plain and simple: The Democratic Party is anti-Christian. 

John Hawkins said, “The GOP often foolishly retreats from social issues. This is a huge mistake in an era when 76% of the country is Christian and most liberals find sincere Christian beliefs to be repellent. We don’t have to preach at anyone, wag our fingers, or turn into legions of Ned Flanders, but we shouldn’t be afraid to talk about our Christian beliefs, stick up for Christians who are under attack, and hammer the Left for its anti-Christian bigotry. Conservatism is a pro-Christian ideology and liberalism is an anti-Christian ideology. We should never be afraid to drive that point home.”

And where do the Democrats turn to get outside help?  Witchcraft.  They did not hold a prayer vigil against Judge Kavanaugh—they had witches conjure up a spell.  I don’t think they believe in witchcraft.  They chose witchcraft for no other reason than it is anti-Christian. And for good measure the witches gave a big donation to Planned Parenthood.  Human sacrifice has always been a part of witchcraft.

Why are we afraid to zero in on this greatest of all arguments against Democrats?  Are we more concerned about appearing unloving than we are about our religious freedom being destroyed?

This mid-term election is solely about the kind of nation you want your family to live in.  Do you want freedom of religion or government openly hostile to your faith?

You need to wake up brother and sister and use our best argument.   Your commitment to Christ should come before your race and gender.  This is not a left-right or conservative-liberal debate.  This is totally a case of…are you pro or anti Christian?   We didn’t make it that way, they did.

This Sunday is the last sermon before the midterms.  Every pulpit should make this point: Your vote can’t get any more moral.  We can’t make a better argument.  The Democrats are at war with Christianity.

YOU DON’T NEGOTIATE WITH CRAZY

Alexandra says we need to spend 40 trillion dollars.  Nancy says, If we win she will flood the House with committees and endless investigations, Elizabeth says she is Cherokee because of trace elements in her DNA.   Hillary says Bill’s behavior was not as bad as Brett’s.  Diane says no man should be believed.  Maxine says God wants us to harass people in restaurants.
Now Carl Bernstein says unless we develop a civil tone and talk to each other we’ll have civil war. He says we need to find common ground.  Not when its quicksand!
Say a man breaks into your home.  You got him dead to rights. Instead of leaving he begins to threaten you.  He claims he has a right to a part of your private property.  He even tells you that if you hurt him he will tell the police.  Not your normal cop arrives.  For some reason the wispy officer finds merit in the burglar’s claim and suggests you find common ground.  “Maybe you can let him use part of your house as a humanitarian gesture.”
We are not vying for some strange new world.  We merely wish to uphold the Constitution, and the values that made America great.  For that we are condemned, threatened and called vile names.

Much of the world condemns Israel for not giving into Palestinian demands.  Yet they forget that the fundamental demand of any of Palestinian offer of peace is that Israel cease to exist.  That is why the Israelis refuse to negotiate.  That’s also why we shouldn’t negotiate with the left.
University presidents say no conservative should be allowed to speak on any campus.  The left is so gone that they have gone from witch hunts to witchcraft.  A group of leftist witches are formally putting hexes on Judge Kavanaugh.  Appropriately, they are also making a donation to Planned Parenthood.  Of course they are!  Human sacrifice has always been a part of witchcraft.
The left loves to say we are headed to civil war.  Like true confederates and plantation owners Blue states want to secede from the Union.  Don’t be fooled.  This is not like 1860 it is more like 1776.  We are not engaged in heated disagreement with folks that have a legitimate beef.  These are loons. And oh yes…thugs.
Who is in the street wearing black masks?  Why did George Soros pay operatives to physically attack Republican women? Splinter News writer Hamilton Nolan penned an essay this week, warning that they are going to start using bombs.
Carl you need to talk to your lunatic friends.  This is no time to tell the rational people they need to give into insanity.
November is not an election based on policy or reasoned debate.  It is a referendum on madness.  It is the American people seeing through the media shills, the false victims, and the bloodthirsty politicians…and voting to stay free.  You don’t negotiate with crazy.

No, I am not kidding you.

I am not kidding you.  A man robbing a convenience store—while holding a gun to the clerk’s head—called the police to complain that the clerk would not open the till, unless the thief first purchased something.

Democratic leaders are exactly like that armed bandit.  While committing a crime—they not only falsely accuse the victim of a crime—they call the FBI.

As a nation swimming in moral confusion—we can’t see the towering injustice of this entire lurid affair against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.  But that is not even the worst of it.

Now imagine if the police had sympathized with the armed intruder and investigated to see if the clerk had behaved properly. Imagine if members of his own family questioned the clerk’s reluctance to give into the robbery.  (Jeff Flake.)

Republicans should be outraged in the face of tyranny—they should push for the vote, confirm Kavanaugh, and let the chips fall where they may.  They should heed the words of Abraham Lincoln, “Let us have faith that right makes might, and in that faith, let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it.”

Now, wouldn’t you love to hear the original recording of the robber to the police?  “I am trying to rob this store and the cashier not cooperating.”  That is precisely what Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony before the committee felt like to me.

Julie Swetnick—the other Brett Kavanaugh accuser—was sued for misconduct allegations at a Portland company.

In the suit, Webtrends alleged Swetnick claimed to have graduated from Johns Hopkins University but the company said it subsequently learned the school had no record of her attendance. Webtrends said she also “falsely described her work experience” at a prior employer.

The suit also alleges Swetnick “engaged in unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” while at Webtrends and “made false and retaliatory allegations that other co-workers had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward her.”

The suit alleges Swetnick “engaged in unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” directed at two male employees during a business lunch, with Webtrends customers present. Swetnick claimed two other employees had sexually harassed her, according to the suit.

Webtrends’ suit said it determined Swetnick had engaged in misconduct but could not find evidence to support her allegations against her colleagues. Later, the company alleged, Swetnick took medical leave and simultaneously claimed unemployment benefits in the District of Columbia.

Diane Feinstein is as irrational as the now over-referenced robber—holding back false accusations until they would inflict the most pain.   Turning a blind eye to the collateral damage to an innocent family.  This man watched his children traumatized, and his sparkling reputation besmirched.  He got mad.  Which leads me to the heart of this blog.

The left—in the stupidest argument ever—says his anger proves he is unfit to be on the Supreme Court.  Listen to the Los Angeles Times editorial by David G. Savage: “Determined to clear his name, he did not just argue that Ford, whom he says he had barely known, had mistakenly identified him as the attacker she feared would rape her, or suffocate her by muffling her cries. Rather, he portrayed the accusation as a politically motivated attack by vengeful Democrats, arising from “the frenzy on the left” to “blow me up and take me down.”

Should he be confirmed, however, at a minimum his nationally televised remarks are likely to linger in Americans’ memories, further undercutting for many the notion that the high court’s decisions reflect a fair, impartial reading of the Constitution, history and precedent — and not the nine justices’ political leanings. In particular, Kavanaugh’s judicial temperament has been called into question.”  After that, Saturday Night Live had a skit satirizing the Judge’s anger.

An unnamed source put this all in proper perspective: “In watching the testimony of Brett Kavanaugh, I am as angry as Mr. Kavanaugh for the absurd questions asked of him by the assortment of senators. These are the very people we elect to be fair but instead choose to embarrass themselves with questions about drinking beer, parties, his groping – all of which took place 35 years ago. If I were Judge Kavanaugh, I would tell them all where to go and walk out. The Democrats are on this rant because they want to hold the seat open just in case they win in 2020. Disgusting!”

My question to you is…what kind of a Judge, husband and father would Brett be if this did not make him angry?  And what kind of people are we if we don’t plug this open sewer hearing in Washington?