WAKE UP! THIS IS THE MOST DANGEROUS TIME I HAVE EVER KNOWN

America is the only nation in history where those who control the money, the airwaves, the press, and the universities, fancy themselves an underground resistance.

WAKE UP! THIS IS THE MOST DANGEROUS TIME I HAVE EVER KNOWN

by Mario Murillo

America is the only nation in history where those who control the money, the airwaves, the press, and the universities, fancy themselves an underground resistance.

We are supposed to believe ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Hollywood, every Ivy League school, plus the Democratic Party have been driven into revolutionary bunkers by Donald Trump.

We have come to a sad and inexplicable madness where the “Freedom Fighters” are fighting against, well, freedom.  The anti-fascists are the fascists.  In the name of liberation, they are taking dead aim at the Bill of Rights…not just some of it—but all of it.   They are the AICLF:  The Already In Control Liberation Front.  They have redefined reality.

Here are but a few of the other realities they have redefined:

Journalism: In what universe, can you award a hack like Jorge Ramos—who openly admits that fighting Trump means you get to tell lies—who is a blue-eyed blond with alabaster skin but says he is nonwhite—the Walter Cronkite award for Journalism.   What’s next?  Janet Napolitano wins Miss America?

Hate: It’s hate to stop terrorists from coming to America.  It’s hate to want a border to keep murders, rapists and drugs out our neighborhoods.  It’s hate when a young girl doesn’t want a naked boy in the women’s locker room.

But most of all, it is hate to have an opinion that disagrees with theirs.  This takes us to the next alternative reality.

Self-Defense:  Words are now a physical attack.  If you say something they disagree with, it’s the same as punching them.  So, when they shut down a rally by beating people, setting buildings on fire and terrorizing crowds—the way they did in Berkeley—it is not rioting… it is self-defense.

Organizers of the anti-Milo Yiannopoulos demonstration at UC Berkeley that ended in $100,000 worth of window-breaking chaos declared it a “stunningly successful” protest — one they’ll happily repeat if the right-wing provocateur tries to return to campus.

“We are happy with the results,” said UC Berkeley Law School alumnus Ronald Cruz of the group By Any Means Necessary., or BAMN. “We were able to meet Mr. Yiannopoulos’ fascist message with massive resistance.”

An estimated 150 “black bloc” anarchists attacked police with rocks and fireworks and used barricades to smash windows at the student union Feb. 1, forcing the cancellation of Yiannopoulos’ appearance.

“We are not affiliated with them, but were united in shutting down the Milo event,” Cruz said.

“Everyone played a part,” he said. “Some engaged in breaking windows — others held signs and made sure that the fascists and the police did not attack anyone.

“This was self-defense,” Cruz said. “Windows can be replaced. People can’t be.”

And this is not the view of a fringe element on the left.  Vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine’s son woody was one of 50 who descended on peaceful Trump supporters with fireworks, smoke bombs and fists.  Tim Kaine referred to his son’s actions as “peaceful protest.”

 

Jake Curtis in his article for The Federalist said: “The actual tactics of the Minnesota resistors were not what made the events of last weekend so frightening. To be sure, they were by no means peaceful or respectful of Trump supporters’ rights to express their views. It’s that the extreme tactics are no longer relegated to the fringes of the Left’s resistance movement.

Wake up! We just entered the most dangerous time I’ve ever known.  Don’t respond by telling me God has this all under control.  If He had this all under control, He would not have ordered us to pray “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

You cannot pray the Lord’s Prayer without expecting marching orders.  You cannot utter those sacred words and then enter a pulpit with Pablum that denies the danger your congregation faces.

God is looking for those who will obey His plan to save America.  If we do not pray with fervent heat—if we do not stand with our president, then we better prepare for a darkness beyond words for our children.

While the danger is new the answer is not new—it is timeless.  When hell belches out a new weapon of mass damnation—heaven is not passive!   God seeks those who will rise up in the Name of Jesus and thrust the spear of anointed righteousness into the heart of darkness.

We’ve already had one great miracle…now let’s get the next big miracle.  The alternative is too terrible to imagine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump’s Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle

At 7:36 p.m. Tuesday, Rachel Maddow tweeted, “BREAKING: We’ve got Trump tax returns. Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC. (Seriously),” sending the internet into a frenzy of theorizing. Did Maddow have Donald Trump’s tax returns or just one of the Trumps’ tax returns? Could this be it, the tax return that would bring down the Donald? If this was it, why wasn’t MSNBC cutting into its programming, instead of running a countdown clock to Maddow’s show? By 8:24, Maddow was tweeting that the tax return in question was Donald Trump’s 1040 from 2005. By 8:30, still half an hour before Maddow started airing, the White House had responded to the MSNBC report, saying that Trump had paid $38 million on income of $150 million that year. An hour later, about 20 minutes after The Rachel Maddow Show started, Maddow would confirm these numbers, turning her big scoop about Donald Trump’s long-missing tax returns into a cautionary tale about overhype. Rachel Maddow, you played yourself—and us too.

 

Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump’s Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle

Willa PaskinWILLA PASKIN

Willa Paskin is Slate’s television critic.

“It’s been a little bit of a hullabaloo around here this evening, I apologize for being flustered,” Maddow said at the top of the hour, before confirming that her show had copies of Donald Trump’s federal tax returns, obtained by the reporter David Cay Johnston, to share with her audience. “In just a second we’re going to show you exactly what it is we’ve got,” she said, before launching, instead, into a 20-minute monologue. Maddow seemed uncharacteristically nervous as she wended her way though what could kindly be described as context and which I am unkindly describing as word salad, a long meander that was difficult to follow even without the distracting promise of a revelatory tax return at its end.

The monologue started contextually enough, with a long-winded skewering of Trump’s refusal to share his tax returns that touched on Richard Nixon, the Clintons, and his unaudited tax forms, before veering off conspiratorially. “Whether or not you are a supporter of Donald Trump,” Maddow said, “It ought to give you pause that his explanations [for not releasing his tax returns] have never made any factual sense. … When you get an excuse from them that doesn’t make sense, you have to look for another reason. What’s the real explanation? Well, choose your own adventure.” She then launched into a long hypothetical about a particular Russian oligarch’s possible relationship to Trump that touched on Florida real estate, Deutsche Bank, and Preet Bharara that Trump’s tax returns—though not, as it would turn out, the ones she actually had—could conceivably clear up.

The longer Maddow went on, ever deeper into a conspiratorial thicket, the clearer it became that whatever tax returns Maddow had, they weren’t as juicy as the ones she was talking about. If she had anything that damning, she would have shared them from the start. TV is a ratings game, but an entire episode about highly damaging tax returns is just as likely to get you great ratings as milking the possibility that you have highly damaging tax returns and less likely to get you compared to Geraldo. Maddow even went so far as to hold the tax returns back until after the first commercial break, as if we were watching an episode of The Bachelor and not a matter of national importance—because we weren’t, in fact, watching a matter of national importance, just a cable news show trying to set a ratings record.

After the first break—at which point the tax returns were already available on the internet and glossed by the Daily Beast—Maddow was joined by Johnston, and she began by asking him how he knew Trump hadn’t sent the returns himself. Johnston said that he could have. A few hours after Maddow finished airing, this has become a popular conspiracy theory, simply because, if Donald Trump were to share any of his tax returns, the 2005 1040 seems like a good candidate. Trump paid taxes at a rate of around 4 percent, but because of the alternate minimum tax, he also paid an additional $31 million. The form revealed that, rather than not paying taxes and making no money, Trump paid $38 million on $150 million in income. Maddow promised to pull a sordid revelation out of a hat and instead plucked out … Trump’s credibility? Maddow was soon parsing, asking Johnston to explain that Trump is currently trying to do away with the AMT, which, unfair as it may be, still wouldn’t change the amount he paid in 2005.

As the show went on, it became clear that Maddow knew she didn’t quite have the scoop that had been promised. “What would we have to see, what would we hope to get in mail,” she asked Johnston, “if we were going to get to the real meat of Donald Trump’s foreign ties?”—i.e., what would be more meaningful than the tax form that we have? Speaking to Chris Hayes and Johnston, she said, “The story here to me is, a) we have obtained this [tax form], b) that this stuff is obtainable.” “BREAKING: Trump’s tax returns theoretically obtainable. Tonight, 9 p.m. ET. MSNBC. (Seriously)” does make for a less rousing tweet.

Trump’s tax returns, whatever information they happen to contain, constitute a major scoop. Maddow’s social media team ensured the highest possible ratings for that scoop. But if ever a story should have been delivered in a stentorian, fuddy-duddy, nonpartisan manner, this was it. In positioning it as a grand revelation, a vital step in comprehending Trump’s corruption, MSNBC created an exceedingly cynical spectacle. By playing into the network’s loyal liberal audience’s fantasy that there exists a Trump silver bullet, it instead delivered Trump a positive news cycle—the guy pays taxes! Who knew!—amidst the debacle of the American Health Care Aact, along with more evidence that the media is aligned against him. The lesson? Don’t tell us you have news, just tell us the news.

TV Ratings: MSNBC Falls Below HLN in May, Rachel Maddow Hits Lows

TV Ratings: MSNBC Falls Below HLN in May, Rachel Maddow Hits Lows

Fox News Channel maintains a handsome lead in primetime and total day, while primetime runner-up CNN continues a healthy climb from the lows of 2012.

The Rachel Maddow Show - H 2013
MSNBC
“The Rachel Maddow Show”

HLN’s wall-to-wall coverage of the Jodi Arias trial has had substantial ratings legs. Surging around the time of the May 8 verdict, the network notched an extremely rare monthly victory: It topped MSNBC in total day and primetime. And with CNN posting its second consecutive month as a distant primetime runner-up to Fox News Channel, MSNBC is in a very precarious fourth place.

Averaging 539,000 viewers in primetime and 175,000 viewers in the adults 25-54 demographic, MSNBC suffered double-digit drops from last May — down a respective 20 and 19 percent. Losses were less substantial in total day, down 10 percent to an average 346,000 viewers and down 7 percent to 115,000 adults 25-54, while all other nets pulled growth in multiple categories.

 

The soft start for All In With Chris Hayes has not helped. Hayes, down 32 percent in total viewers fromThe Ed Show last May, has offered a poor lead-in for MSNBC’s primetime flagship, The Rachel Maddow Show, at 9 p.m. The show delivered its lowest-rated month since it debuted in September 2008 (717,000 total viewers) and its second lowest with adults 25-54 (210,000). Maddow was topped by typical time slot victor Sean Hannity and CNN’s Piers Morgan.

Winner FNC, posting modest year-to-year losses in the key demo, was still number three across all of cable in both primetime and total day. Heavily covering White House woes like the Benghazi hearings, the network averaged 1,246,000 daily viewers (up 24 percent) and 236,000 adults 25-54 (down 5 percent) for the full day. Primetime saw 17 percent growth with 1,973,000 total viewers and a 6 percent dip with 308,000 in 25-54.

Read the complete rankings, May 2013 versus May 2012, via Nielsen:

Total Day
FNC: 1,246,000 total viewers, up 24 percent (236,000 in 25-54, down 5 percent)
CNN: 465,000 total viewers, up 61 percent (161,000 in 25-54, up 92 percent)
MSNBC: 346,000 total viewers, down 10 percent (115,000 in 25-54, down 7 percent)
HLN: 494,000 total viewers, up 111 percent (175,000 in 25-54, up 90 percent)

Primetime
FNC: 1,973,000 total viewers, up 17 percent (308,000 in 25-54, down 6 percent)
CNN: 660,000 total viewers, up 70 percent (225,000 in 25-54, up 97 percent)
MSNBC: 539,000 total viewers, down 20 percent (175,000 in 25-54, down 19 percent)
HLN: 624,000 total viewers, up 91 percent (209,000 in 25-54, up 97 percent.

MARIO’S NOTE:

Is it me or did you notice a mood change ever since Obama said “God Bless Planned Parenthood”?   The crack in his armor seemed to spread quickly as scandal after scandal crashes in on him and his agenda.   I believe that this tragic remark crossed some kind of invisible line.

Let’s not leave prayer out of this observation.   Heaven hears the cry of the righteous not only here but around the world.   

Throughout history, God has provoked Satan to overplay his hand.  In our time, we have seen a rush to promote the death of marriage, the legalization of drugs, job killing environmental bills and a host of other crazy projects. 

You would think that the left would take its foot off of the accelerator but no they cannot seem to help themselves.  This too seems to be the result of divine manipulation.

Rachel Maddow and MSNBC are the current victims of this intervention.  Her nightly rants, cheap shots and heavy handed pontifications have finally frayed the nerves of even the most open minded progressives.   MSNBC hitched its wagon to Obama and he is leading them over a cliff.   The growing chorus across America seems to be “good riddance!”

Is the hand of God in all of this?   I say yes!  To be sure this is but a small victory when you consider the great breakthrough of moral awakening that we seek but it is a victory.  That is why I want to ask you to step up your prayers for greater victories, speak out for morality and marriage and do not be ashamed of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  

Rick Warren and the nightmare of trying to please everyone.

Rick Warren’s Nightmare is trying to please everyone.

An important lesson for all believers.

As the story goes, a man once tried to get safe passage across the Mason Dixon Line by wearing gray Confederate Pants and a Blue Union Army Coat thinking no one would shoot at him.   Instead everyone started shooting at him.   In the posts below you can see that both sides are indeed shooting at Rick Warren.

Rick made a clear mistake.  He is totally misreading the times that he lives in.   He and Bill Hybels are credited with perfecting the seeker model for Churches.  If by some slim chance you do not know what the seeker model is here is a short working definition:

This seeker friendly purpose driven Church growth movement is founded on corporative marketing strategies and pop psychology concepts that are known to be successful to reach large numbers of people. Most of the theology of Christianity that is less appealing to the world is shrouded so it will not be an offense to anyone.

Here is the problem.  Seeker models are based on a society that no longer exists.  Obama poisoned the dialogue.  He has so polarized America that everyone is forced to take sides on every issue.   Time was that Rick could avoid comment on all of these issues and just kept with the pop psychology.

This also means that the end of the seeker model is at hand because Christians are speaking out about compromise more than ever.  You will see the attendance begin to drop in Churches where the Pastor sounds like he is quoting fortune cookies.

What Obama has done is remind us that we are in a war.  He attacked our faith.  He made it clear that Jesus has no seat at the Obama agenda table.   Essentially, what happened is Gays, and all other activist groups wanted to know where Rick stood on the issues.   The seeker model is not designed for clarifying issues.   The hunt for clarity is on both sides.

This is why you will see more unapologetic Bible preaching.  A growing number of people are demanding it.   Obama caused that as well.  He made it okay to bash Christians.  Bashing Christians had a unique effect on the Church.  It unified and intensified doctrine and conviction.

Simply put, the neighborhood is now too noisy for the seeker model and all pulpits are being forced to come clean.  The seekers are no longer so friendly.

Thinking of taking your Spirit-Filled Church to a seeker model?   It is a clear path to disaster.

So here we see Rick trying to walk a tightrope on homosexuality and it backfires with Christians.

Rick Warren Uncertain if Homosexual Behavior is Sinful, Says ‘Gays’ Go to Heaven

November 29, 2012 |Heather Clark

Controversy is stirring over recent comments made by Rick Warren, author of the best-selling book The Purpose-Driven Life and megachurch leader of Saddleback Church in California, who stated that homosexual behavior “might be” sinful, and that he believes homosexuals go to Heaven.

During an interview this week with theHuffington Post, Warren was asked by Marc Lamont Hill if having romantic feelings for a member of the same sex is a sin. Leading up to the question, Warren was explaining that he does not hate homosexuals, and that people should disagree politely on the subject of homosexuality.

“What about the love part, though? I hear about the AIDS part,” asked Hill. “It’s not illegal to love somebody,” Warren replied.

“But you think it’s a sin,” Hill asserted. “No, it’s not a sin to love somebody,” Warren said.

“It might be a sin to have sex with them,” he added. “It might be.”

Peter LaBarbera, the president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality stated that he was shocked at Rick Warren’s comments.

“It’s also sinful to lust after another man,” LaBarbera said. “We can’t advocate sin as believers, and we have to think about how that the person that’s struggling with homosexuality is going to hear this.”

“There is no Biblical basis for his statements,” he added. “I think Rick Warren needs to retract that [‘might be’] statement and clarify it. If he does not retract it, he has fallen into error.”

“Rick Warren has a heart for lost souls, but he seems fearful he’ll offend people he could otherwise lead to salvation by telling the truth about their sin. That may indicate an inadequate faith in God’s sovereignty, or a failure to fully believe God’s Word has the power to transform lives,” Mason concluded. “I pray he’ll find the courage to be just as determined to be the salt of the earth as he is to be a light to the world.”

Requests for comment were not returned by Saddleback Church.

Now we see that all of that effort to gain secular acceptance not only alienated people in the church.   The gay community still thinks you are hateful

Rick Warren Doubles Down, Accuses Critics Of “Christophobia”

 

Via John Aravosis at AMERICAblog, Rick Warren is doubling down and accusing his critics of “hate-speech” and “Christophobia.”

Rachel Maddow has the video, and takes Warren to task for the hypocrisy of saying that it’s unfair to call his views hateful while simultaneously accusing his critics of hate speech. Moreover, as Rachel notes, Warren flat-out lies about his comments comparing gay marriage to pedophilia and incest.

Setting aside Warren’s role as inaugural invocation speaker (for a brief moment), I don’t think there’s any way to defend what he is now saying. I accept the proposition that it’s possible to disagree on the issue of gay marriage without calling someone names.

But there’s really no comparison between gay marriage and incest or pedophilia, and if Warren thinks they are equivalent, he’s either a fan of incest and pedophilia, or he has serious problem with gay people. And calling his critics “Christophobes” just makes matters worse.

A simple apology from Warren for having made the comparison probably would have made this whole controversy go away. But now he’s doubling down, and it’s just making matters worse.